| |
Issue #150, Summer 2007 |
Meeting the Foreclosure CrisisBy Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio)
|
Every day, news reports document rising foreclosures
and their growing impact on our economy. As the congressional representative
from Ohio's north coast - a region with one of the highest foreclosure
rates in the nation - I am keenly aware of the detrimental effect this
phenomenon is having on our families and our communities at large. Every week when I return home, the overwhelming
presence of "for sale" signs plastered throughout the district
is a visible reminder of how many people cannot afford their mortgage
payments. The statistics mirror this observation. In the fourth quarter
of 2006, Ohio experienced a higher rate of foreclosure than any other
state in the nation. Indeed, our rate is three times the national average.
A recent report from the Coalition on
Homelessness and Housing in Ohio (COHHIO) estimates that $14 billion
in adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) loans will reset over the next two
years, affecting up to 200,000 homeowners. These numbers play into the
more than 2.2 million foreclosures that are predicted to result nationwide
from subprime mortgages that originated from the third quarter of 1998
through 2005, according to the Center for Responsible Lending. The cumulative
impact of irresponsible mortgage lending and the securitization of mortgages
has threatened the safety and soundness of our financial system. Homes
are the most important assets people have. America can do far better. The COHHIO report has documented the extent of
the problem in Ohio. COHHIO's data show that in 2006, 12 of the 13 largest
Ohio counties experienced a 25-percent increase in foreclosures over
2005, with an estimated 80,000 foreclosure filings. That year, all but
10 of Ohio's 88 counties saw an increase in the number of foreclosure
filings. Two counties I represent, Lucas County and Lorain County, experienced
a 210-percent and 445-percent growth, respectively, in the past 10 years.
Even more troubling, COHHIO notes that the volume
of foreclosures is expected to increase at a rapid pace in 2007 and
2008 because of the subprime ARM loans in Ohio scheduled to reset at
significantly higher rates. In 2005, subprime loans accounted for about
13 percent of the mortgages issued nationally, compared to nearly 28
percent of the mortgages issued in Ohio. Currently, subprime loans represent
18 percent of all outstanding Ohio mortgages held by the secondary market
and other loan servicers, yet they account for a staggering 70 percent
of all foreclosures. In many cases, subprime loans are not underwritten
to anticipate the inevitable rate escalation. This is a blatant abuse,
as some Ohio subprime lenders allow initial mortgage payments of up
to 60 percent of a family's pretax income - which ultimately grow to
be as much as 85 percent of a borrower's pretax income once the favorable
rates expire. When you factor in prepayment penalties, stated income
loans, and our region's depreciating real estate values, the nightmare
intensifies. Immediate and Long-term Recommendations In my region, many nonprofits have been addressing
the problem locally. Toledo's Neighborhood
Housing Services has established pools of rescue funds to bail out
homeowners who have fallen behind. These funds are able to help borrowers
recovering from short-term problems, such as a brief period of unemployment.
The majority of troubled borrowers are trapped
in mortgages that are beyond their means for the long haul. The Ohio
Housing Finance Agency (OHFA) is stepping in to serve this category
of borrowers. A partner in Governor Ted Strickland's Foreclosure Prevention
Taskforce, OHFA has developed a refinancing program backed by the sale
of taxable bonds. This program, which began in April 2007, is expected
to grow to $500 million this year - potentially helping several thousand
homeowners refinance their loans. OHFA's Opportunity Loan Refinance
Program offers favorable financing to borrowers who feel their current
loan does not fit their financial circumstances. Nonprofit housing groups are also responding to
the needs of Ohio homeowners through housing counseling. However, housing-assistance
counselors often cannot track the loan to its ultimate holder, so workouts
between lenders and borrowers are not always possible. Representatives
from organizations affiliated with NeighborWorks
America, a national organization that provides supports for community-based
revitalization efforts, report additional difficulties when trying to
help borrowers connect with their lenders. Sometimes it takes loan servicers
so long to work out the terms of their loans that borrowers' situations
worsen because of the fees and penalties that are racked up over the
course of the negotiation process. Still other lenders are only willing
to make minor concessions, such as granting short extensions for borrowers
to catch up. For most borrowers, such extensions are not nearly enough
to make good on their loan commitment, and they only delay the likelihood
that borrowers will default on their loans. In employing long-term solutions, we must restore
the three Cs of lending - character, collateral, and collectability.
These principles of due diligence have been violated by a mortgage-backed
security system that fails to provide accountability in underwriting,
proper management of loan assets, and checks and balances for both the
mortgager and mortgagee. As I suggested to the House Financial Services
Committee when I testified in April, expeditious action by Congress
can help hundreds of thousands of homeowners prevent defaults and foreclosures.
To meet national financial crises of this magnitude, there is a need
to bring all parties to the table. With potential losers on both sides
of the mortgage market table, homeowners and the lending community should
realize it is in their best interests to work out solutions. I urged
the committee to invite the President's Working Group on Financial Markets
- which includes the heads of the Treasury Department, the Security
and Exchange Commission, the Federal Reserve, and the Commodity Futures
Trading Commission - to testify. This group is uniquely positioned to
engage in the intervention necessary to stem foreclosures. The committee should also develop legislation to
establish a mechanism through the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) and perhaps the Federal Reserve to help families restructure
their loans. This is the most significant solution to curb defaults
on mortgages facing foreclosure. According to COHHIO, as many as 20
subprime lenders have gone into bankruptcy or sold off their liabilities
to mortgage portfolios. Subprime lenders, mortgage holders, loan servicers,
and investors need to make significant concessions in restructuring
mortgages - such as forgiving a portion of the loan, writing off late
fees, setting reasonable and fixed interest rates, or extending pay-out
periods. While there is likely to be resistance, the alternative will
probably be worse. According to COHHIO, the mortgage industry will be
incentivized to make deals because it is better than bringing thousands
of vacant homes into their inventories. Programs like that of OHFA's Opportunity Loan Refinance
Program need to be picked up and extended by other lenders. Fannie Mae,
Freddie Mac, the Federal Housing Administration, and the Federal Home
Loan Bank should offer refinancing products to reach eligible pools
of borrowers. Congress should consider increased funding to enhance
these programs. Housing-counseling services at nonprofits are often
overextended because of the high demand for help from homeowners facing
foreclosure. Programs like the HUD-approved 888-995-HOPE counseling
hotline are doing excellent work linking homeowners to counseling help,
and additional support is needed to increase their reach. Foreclosure
and credit counselors continue to encounter unresponsive mortgage companies
that have no mechanism for dealing with problem mortgages and no organized
procedures or programs to offer mortgage workouts. In addition to these
efforts, we need a full-service mortgage-foreclosure hotline at HUD.
This needs to be an aggressive, all-inclusive, well-staffed, and well-advertised
service. As mortgage companies and subprime lenders file
for bankruptcy, firm assets important to refinancing mortgages at risk
are being sold off to other companies through the bankruptcy courts.
A moratorium should be placed on this practice to allow workouts to
occur where possible. And finally, as the secondary mortgage market has
enabled the reckless explosion of the subprime mortgage-lending industry,
it should play a role in repairing the damage. Without the capital backing
of these financiers, the abuses would not have grown out of control.
Federal regulation and enforcement of the subprime-mortgage industry
needs to be aggressively pursued and enforced and must be extended to
apply to the entire subprime industry. Maximum interest rates must be
capped at reasonable levels, and prepayment fees should be eliminated.
More stringent underwriting criteria must be adhered to - including
appropriate consideration of a borrower's ability to repay the loan
over the entire life of the loan, rather than simply the early years
of suppressed teaser rates. Companies that engage in predatory lending
must be aggressively penalized - particularly those who seek out borrowers
who are actually eligible for prime loans. Together, these actions can
reverse the trend of foreclosures and restore stability and security
within the housing industry.
Copyright 2007 Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio) is currently serving her 13th term in the U.S. Congress. She is a senior member of the House Appropriations Committee, where she serves on the Defense, Agriculture, and Transportation and Housing and Urban Development Appropriations Subcommittees. |
|
|
|