|
Issue #150, Summer 2007 |
|
Editor’s Note Conversation StarterBy Alice Chasan |
HOW DO WE TAKE CARE of our own? It's a deceptively
simple question that's so fraught with contention in the American public
discourse that we could devote this and every issue of Shelterforce
to the cacophony of answers it provokes. In recent months, the question has surfaced again
in the heated rhetoric over immigration reform. Conservatives sought
to convince working people that they carry crushing social and economic
burdens imposed by Washington-in this case, arguing that the American
way of life would be diminished if the nation expands to include presently
undocumented aliens. It's a strategy of distorting economic realities
the right has used before to spur middle- and working-class Americans
to vote against their own best interests. And it's whipped up grass-roots
opposition to congressional action on pending legislation to give illegal
aliens a path toward legal status. Listen to opponents of the legislation and you'll
hear a potent mixture of fear, anger, and an inchoate sense that the
federal government is obligated to help Americans before giving a hand
to others. Anti-immigration activists pushed those buttons to move the
public rightward on the question. Yet a careful listener can also hear some voices
of opposition speaking in terms that diverge from the politics of resentment
and remind us that Americans' impulse to take care of our own still
trumps right-wing fear-mongering about the evils of big government and
social engineering. "A lot of our American people in Detroit are
hurting," Monique Thibodeaux, a middle-aged Michigan office manager
opposed to the immigration bill was quoted as saying in a New York
Times feature on the grass-roots "roar" against the plan.
"It's just not right." What would it take to make Mrs. Thibodeaux's view
a fulcrum to move the national debate in a progressive direction? Maybe
all it would take is responsible and responsive leaders prepared to
channel Americans' best impulses for the common good. A recent Zogby International poll of "likely
voters" showed that 58 percent want a presidential candidate in
2008 who "sets a goal of halving poverty within a decade."
While the survey was silent on affordable housing, it offered intriguing
clues to respondents' attitudes: The majority rejected the idea that
poor people are responsible for their poverty, instead blaming high
costs and low pay. While the Zogby poll didn't link these concerns
to the crisis of housing affordability, the connection is clear: According
to the Harvard University Joint Center for Housing Studies' "State
of the Nation's Housing 2007," one in seven households pays
more than half its income for housing. And the bite is bigger for low-wage
and part-time workers, retirees, and the disabled. More than four in five respondents told Zogby that
they're looking for a candidate with solid ideas for "solutions
oriented at combating problems experienced by many impoverished families."
They favor policies to improve education for all; end predatory-lending
practices targeted at low-income families; raise the minimum wage; expand
the Earned Income Tax Credit; expand food-stamp programs to end hunger
and ensure good nutrition; and guarantee universal health care and child
care. If they were asked, I imagine they would have added decent, affordable
housing to the list of policy priorities they want to hear from a presidential
candidate. The real question is why the housing question isn't on the
table at all most of the time. As an editor who views a magazine-and a Web site-as
an ongoing conversation, I have a sense of excitement about coming to
Shelterforce at a political moment ripe with the possibility
of real change. Getting housing questions on the national agenda in
the 2008 election season is a challenge that galvanizes us at Shelterforce.
The magazine has a long, proud tradition of creating a space where practical,
progressive solutions to the nation's social and economic inequities
are aired and examined through the lens of affordable housing and community-building.
I invite you to share your ideas and join me in what promises to be
a vitally important conversation. |
|
|
|