| |
Issue #149, Spring 2007 |
The Purchase of a LifetimeThe bank balked. Neighbors grumbled. But these poor tenants would not be swept away in the real estate boom.By Debbi WilgorenOther Stories in this issue on Shared-Equity Homeownership and Asset-Building: City Hall Steps In: Municipally supported community land trusts boost affordable-housing stocks. A Winning Campaign: D.C. housing advocates win inclusionary zoning legislation. Epilogue: Toward a
Common Agenda for Growing Shared-Equity Housing |
The community room filled early that July night
in 2002. The tenants of Capital Manor were about to learn how much it
would cost to stay in their apartments. Their century-old complex-three
34-unit buildings-was a dilapidated eyesore in a gentrifying D.C. neighborhood.
The tenants knew they had to buy their complex
or risk being displaced. They had chosen a developer to guide them through
the process. His colored marker now squeaked across a whiteboard at
the front of the room. $1,500, he wrote. That's what each family would
have to come up with in the next six weeks. Looks of disbelief spread through the room. The
25 tenants gathered were dishwashers, janitors, people on public assistance.
"How many people do you actually think have that kind of money
just sitting somewhere?" demanded tenant association president
Deborah Thomas. Their developer explained that the money was needed
to show potential lenders that the tenants were committed to the project,
as well as to pay for engineering and architectural studies. Thomas returned to her apartment with trepidation.
Within the hour, her phone started to ring. In Spanish and English,
the callers had the same message. No puedo pagar. I can't pay. After a year of hard work, of carwashes and raffles, of meetings and late-night phone calls, the whole plan seemed to be disintegrating before her eyes. We Won't Go It began when the previous owner, knowing that the building's affordability
subsidies were about to expire, signed a contract to sell it for $3.4
million. Thomas knew that D.C. law allows tenants of an apartment building to
match any purchase offer. She began to spread the word. The tenants
formed an association and elected Thomas, who had lived on W Street
for nearly 30 years, president. Thomas's top lieutenants were Peggy
Fitzgerald, who had lived at Capital Manor for 28 years, and Osmin Rodriguez,
the resident manager who acted as a liaison to the Latino tenants. The tenant leaders started by inviting a parade of speakers to educate
them about the tenant purchase process. In fall 2001, they selected
Georgetown's public-interest law clinic to represent them. The clinic
assigned them Aaron W. O'Toole, a 29-year-old lawyer who spoke passable
Spanish and had guided three smaller tenant-purchase efforts. Next, the association interviewed developers. Most offered a low-income
tax-credit deal. But these tenants wanted to buy their buildings right
away and form a cooperative. "This tenants association has already
voted, and we want ownership," resident Nerissa Phillips snapped
at one developer. Only Jair K. Lynch, 30, said he would find a way. Lynch grew up in
D.C. and returned there after winning a silver medal in gymnastics at
the 1996 Olympics to launch his own development firm in a restored U
Street rowhouse. Lynch and the tenants agreed on a plan: Refurbish and sell one of the
three buildings as market-rate condos, then use the profits to repair
the other buildings, which would become a low-income cooperative. But when Lynch announced the $1,500 deposit figure, people started
bailing out. Panicking, Thomas appealed to O'Toole, who said there was
nothing sacred about $1,500-it was just Lynch's estimate of what would
cover costs and impress the banks. "What's the smallest amount that would impress them?" Thomas
asked. "What's the most you think the tenants can give?" came the
reply. Together, they agreed to gamble on $500. Only $100 would be due at
the July 23 tenants meeting. Tenants would have until September 15 to
come up with the other $400. The day of reckoning was a sweltering evening that felt even worse
inside the community room. About 40 people showed up, many more than
had been coming in recent weeks. Over the next seven weeks, 55 households
put down deposits of $500, or as close to that as they could manage.
The last payment came 40 minutes after midnight September 15, when a woman knocked on Peggy Fitzgerald's door, panicked that she might be too late. Fitzgerald assured her she was not. All or Nothing The mayor was running for reelection, and critics were blasting him
for doing too little to prevent the displacement of the poor from newly
posh neighborhoods. The city had set $25 million aside for housing assistance,
and Lynch was applying for $2 million. Lynch told the tenants association board three buildings would have
to go co-op and remain affordable. Nobody would be able to cash in at
market rates for at least a decade. Also, the funding decision would
not come until December-and an outside buyer was waiting to snap up
the complex if the tenants did not close on their purchase by January
15. Though some members of the board initially found this revision to be unacceptable, ultimately, the decision was up to the entire tenants association, which gathered a week later. After many tenants recounted stories of nearby apartment buildings that had been emptied and turned into condos none of them could afford, the yes vote was unanimous. The Color Divide The tenant board was chosen to include both. Meetings and documents
were always translated. At a fundraising dinner, the $5 buffet featured
chimichangas as well as chicken wings. Stereo speakers boomed hip-hop,
then salsa, then hip-hop again. People who for years had passed each
other in the hallways without speaking began exchanging polite greetings. Little such camaraderie, however, developed with the mostly white residents
of the 19 recently renovated upscale rowhouses across the street. The
northsiders said they liked the idea of living on a street that was
racially and economically mixed. But some owners worried that Capital
Manor's run-down appearance detracted from their property values. They
complained about noise-Capital Manor's intercom system stopped working
years ago, so visitors often announced their arrival by blaring car
horns. When Thomas proposed that the city build a playground on an empty
lot between two rowhouses, the northsiders objected, saying it would
become a magnet for thugs. At a December 2002 neighborhood meeting, the topic quickly turned to
crime. Rowhouse owners asked how the cooperative board would keep out
drugs and violence. "There was a shooting there. It didn't have anything to do with
anyone in the building?" one man asked skeptically. "Absolutely not," snapped Thomas. The tenants left the meeting
seething. The northsiders looked at them, they said, as if they were
the drug dealers who sometimes loitered on W Street. "Don't group me with drugs," fumed Michelle Craig, a conventions concierge at a downtown Marriott. "We were here first. And I'm not leaving." Home Stretch Ownership would mean stability-for her family and her neighbors. "I
don't want my kids to have to grow up and struggle. I want them to have
a place," Thomas would say. Winning city money was supposed to help the loan application with the
National Cooperative Bank,
which had tentatively promised a $3.5 million acquisition loan and an
$8.1 million construction loan. But Alexandra Johns, a vice president
at the bank's development corporation, called just before Christmas
to ask why Lynch hadn't conducted the usual engineering and architectural
studies. He explained that the reduced deposits had meant no money for
predevelopment work. Johns balked. You've got to meet these tenants, Lynch told her. You've got to see
the neighborhood. The two set up a visit for January 6. It wasn't enough. The next day the development corporation's loan committee
decided the deal was too risky. Unanticipated construction needs could
send costs soaring. What's more, the funding letter from the city seemed
tentatively worded. Lynch quickly secured a new letter stressing the city's strong commitment.
And he said that if costs climbed, he would persuade the tenants to
seek outside investors to preserve the complex as an affordable rental
building. On January 14, loan-committee members reassembled. They considered the U Street corridor, where prices were rising every
month. They considered the tenants, who had been working toward the purchase
for well over a year. They considered the project team, including Lynch, the former Olympic
gymnast, who had cut his fee by 20 percent because the budget was so
tight. "I found myself saying to people, 'silver medalist,' " Johns
recalled later. "This is somebody with a history of focus and successful
leadership, who's from this neighborhood and is committed to this project." The committee approved the loan to buy the building and said details
of the construction loan could be worked out later. At the closing, the room was crowded with people. Shyly, Rodriguez
unveiled a bottle of champagne and glass flutes. O'Toole then opened
his own bag to reveal another bottle of bubbly and plastic cups. When everything was signed and the champagne uncorked, the attorneys
insisted that Thomas, Mitchell and Rodriguez drink from the glass flutes. "Tenants get the real deal?" Thomas joked. "Not tenants-owners," Michael Diamond, O'Toole's boss, corrected her. "Owners get the real deal." Congratulations, Maybe "If you see your neighbor's kids hitting on the walls or breaking
windows or dragging trash through the halls, don't forget that money
to fix those things is coming out of your pocket," she said. "We
can no longer call the owner to say, 'This is broke, that's broke
'
We are the owner." Hands flew up. Boys from down the block roamed the hallways, smoking
marijuana, said one woman. They trailed residents into the building
and slipped pennies into the doorframe, jamming the lock. Call the police,
urged Thomas, prompting an older man to shake his head. He'd done that,
he said, only to have the cops let slip to the youths the apartment
number from which the call was made. O'Toole reminded them to save for their down payments-$2,300 for a
one-bedroom, $3,200 for a two-bedroom, cheap for the neighborhood but
daunting for those in the room. "I'm going to be eating a whole lot of hot dogs," sighed
Michelle Craig, a single mother. The woman next to her nodded. "Peanut butter and jelly." The next 18 months were bleak. Renovations were put on indefinite hold
because the construction loan was delayed. Basic repairs went undone.
Drug dealing and loitering continued outside the complex. One resident
was robbed at gunpoint on Christmas Eve. As the bad news mounted, several families announced plans to move.
Cash flow withered each time one of them turned in their keys. Even committed residents found themselves frustrated by the project's
limitations. Construction funds would have to go toward the basics:
sprinkler systems and new roofs, repairs to faulty wiring and worn-out
heating and cooling systems. "Amenities? What are we getting? Nothing," Sylvia Griffis
said during a meeting. No dishwashers. No Internet connection. Not even a choice of paint
color. "What they're offering us is a place to stay that is affordable," countered Mitchell. "A two-bedroom, two-bath in this neighborhood-that's a half-million dollars." Finally Home With the first building completed, the second was emptied. This time,
construction progressed more quickly, but some were not satisfied. Rodriguez,
now tenant association vice president, complained that the floor of
his apartment sagged just as it had before the renovations. Contractors
said the building's foundation had sunk, but Rodriguez was not convinced. "It hasn't gone half the way I wanted it to go," he said
shortly before moving back into his old apartment in mid-July. "It's
still great, but it's not as great as I thought it would be." Renovations of the last of Capital Manor's buildings were completed
Thanksgiving week 2005. But the transformation of the complex was still
underway. Thirty new households still had to be selected to fill empty apartments.
Applicants could not earn more than 80 percent of the area's median
income. Their down payments had to be $12,000 or $20,000, depending
on unit size-much more than what the original residents paid. Lynch
calls the arrival of more moderate-income families "managed change." A mix of incomes is a good thing, he said-"the middle ground between
stagnation and gentrification." The next stage, he added, "is
to really start building the bonds, the glue." Lynch was talking about the new and old members of the co-op. But on
W Street, the challenge also extends to forging ties with the mostly
white, mostly affluent homeowners across the street-many of whom still
regard Capital Manor as a blight. They hate the bright new security
lights, which shine into their bedrooms, and they don't understand why
there wasn't enough money to spruce up the facades. "Their renovation hasn't been some great boon to the neighborhood,"
said Kurt Ehrman, a government lawyer. "It hasn't been a boon to
my home equity." Residents of Capital Manor grouse that northsiders rarely come to their block parties or even greet them on the sidewalks. They find the Orange Hat patrols of the block, launched by the Meridian Hill Neighborhood Association, intrusive. The young men on the corner do not need to be shooed away, said Craig, 50. "They're not all drug dealers, they're not all going to rob you. They have jobs, but they get together and hang." Here for Good Then they walked down the block to Capital Manor. Thomas, part-owner
of a multimillion-dollar cooperative, unlocked the door and entered
the apartment she will one day leave to her children.
|
|
|
|